Manchester United lost to Brentford 1-3 away. In the game, Mbermo once created a penalty kick for Manchester United, but Collins, who had a foul in the penalty area, did not get a red card and just turned yellow. US referee expert David Gelson was interviewed about the controversial penalty, and he believed Collins should be sent off with a red card for a foul.
What do you think about Collins' foul against Mbermo in Manchester United's match against Brentford only received a yellow card?
This is definitely "deprived of obvious goals" and should show a red card. Why did I only give one yellow card and one penalty? I can't understand.
Many people think that if you award a penalty, you can no longer show red cards. There is a so-called "double punishment" rule. Is that true?
Let me clarify some misunderstandings, such as "double punishment", saying that you cannot show a red card while awarding a penalty. This is definitely OK. The rules have changed over the years, and it was indeed the case in the past, but now it is OK.
So, according to the rules, what are the specific conditions that constitute "deprived of obvious goals" and should be presented with a red card? Does this foul meet these conditions? There are several points in the
conditions. First of all, the distance is definitely satisfied with this foul. The second is the number of defensive players, with no other defensive players between the foul location and the goal.
Then there is the direction, he is in the middle of the court, heading towards the goal. Finally, it is the "possibility to control the ball".
Yes, it constitutes "deprived of obvious goals" and shows a red card, and you don't need to have already controlled the ball. Before the ball completely rolled in front of him, he was pulled back, so the foul had already happened and he was pulled away from the ball. He definitely had the possibility of controlling the ball. For a Premier League player, running towards a slowly rolling ball is definitely a possibility of controlling it.
So what is your final conclusion? And what do you think this penalty will have on the direction of the game?
The correct penalty should be a red card and a penalty. How could they not be judged like this (yellow card + penalty kick), I can't understand because it will change the game, right? There were 15 minutes left in the game and a player was sent off, of course, they later lost the penalty, but even so, you'll be 11-to-10 next. I really want to hear the referee company's explanation of this penalty.